News

From a bird’s eye view, blockchain technology may not seem too different from the other tech innovations you’re already familiar with.Continue reading on Medium »
The continued decline in the price of Tron [TRX] has led to an increase in the negative bias against the crypto asset, new data from Santiment revealed.  Data from CoinMarketCap showed that on a year-to-date basis, the price of TRX has gone down by 17.28%. As the decline persists, TRX investors linger in their pessimism […]
Key data The number of ERC-20 tokens created in the Ethereum network in September increased by 6.4%. Average number of Ethereum blocks per day increased by 5.3%. The number of blocks per day has increased by almost 17% after the merge of Ethereum. Average Ethereum gas price decreased by seven percent in September. The average number […] The post September 2022 – Monthly Ethereum Blockchain Analysis appeared first on The Daily Hodl.
Ethereum’s [ETH] network revenue fell by a massive 86% in the third quarter of 2022, according to the report released by Bankless (an informative site focused on crypto). Reportedly, Ethereum recorded $1.96 billion in net revenue in the second quarter (Q2). Unfortunately, the third quarter was a paltry $274.12 million. Since this was the case, […]
Uniswap is predicted to increase 8.42% in the next 5 days and hit a price target of $7.34 per UNI. Check out today's Uniswap price prediction to learn why.
A Digital Identity within a blockchain environment is very important to network participants. In order for a network participant to hold, retain and own valuable digital assets, they must have a Digital Identity. This also enables their ability to accumulate digital assets over time.In the context of this article, blockchain-based digital assets are defined to include cryptocurrencies, utility tokens, security tokens, stable coins, digital stocks, and digital collectables (including NFTs).With regard to Digital Identity, we are not referring to electronic versions of driver’s licences, birth certificates, or passports. What we are referring to is more akin to a wallet address as per Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other cryptocurrencies. These identities are anonymous on public blockchains and are called Decentralised Identifiers (DID).In order to own a digital asset on a blockchain, we need to securely and accurately establish asset ownership. This also relates to digital royalties, revenue streams, voting rights, and payment rights. A Digital Identity enables and preserves digital asset ownership through limited access to consent and access rights via unique private keys and encrypted digital signatures.Taking this a step further, Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) are a new type of identifier that enables verifiable, decentralized digital identity. A Decentralised Identifier (DID) refers to any subject (a person, organization, thing, data model, or abstract entity) as determined by the owner/controller of the DID.Identity on a Public BlockchainOn a public blockchain, network participants are anonymous. The only unique identifiers are wallet addresses. Yet, digital assets are linked to or associated with these wallet addresses. How do you ensure that your wallet address is yours to manage and control?We need a new form and definition of Digital Identity in order to achieve secure and persistent digital asset ownership.How do we establish digital asset ownership?On a public blockchain, the wallet address is a pseudonym for a Digital Identity (I am referring to the public wallet address). This wallet address will have a set of private keys associated with it, enabling the transfer of digital assets to occur only with the owner’s explicit permission in the form of an encrypted digital signature. If you have the private keys, you also have and retain ownership of the digital asset.Let’s consider why it is important for each of us to ensure that we have secure and persistent ownership of our digital assets. Firstly, some behavioural insights are pivotal for understanding when we experience the loss of something important to us.Why are losses, in their many forms so painful?In the context of this article, a loss in digital asset terms is defined as no longer having access to or control of the private keys or encrypted digital signature relating to the digital assets themselves. This may include theft of the private keys (or encrypted digital signature), misplacing them, or losing them altogether.Prospect Theory & Loss AversionLoss aversion is an important concept associated with Prospect Theory and is best described by the expression “losses loom larger than gains”. It is thought that the pain of losing is psychologically about twice as powerful as the pleasure of gaining the equivalent amount. Further, these gains and losses are measured relative to a personal and subjective value reference point.Prospect theory suggests that individuals value gains and losses differently because losses have a far greater psychological and emotional impact. This is especially true for items with symbolic, experiential, or emotional significance and can lead to endowment effects that are best explained by psychological factors related to loss-aversion.Thus, having identified the high emotional impact of Prospect Theory (loss aversion) and endowment effects, most individuals will do whatever they can to avoid experiencing the painful emotions associated with loss.Knowing that we wish to avoid digital asset losses (as defined above), we now turn our attention to another important aspect of digital asset ownership.Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI)Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI) is a unique decentralised approach to Digital Identity that provides individuals with complete control over their Digital Identity and credentials.“Self-sovereign” means the individual identity holder controls their credentials, using them whenever and however they please, without being forced to request permission of an intermediary.SSI is a two-party relationship model, with no third party coming between you and the organisation, now considered your peer.SSI begins with a digital wallet that contains digital credentials. These are digitally signed (encrypted) verifiable credentials.To exchange digital credentials securely and privately, one peer can establish a direct, encrypted connection with another peer. You can control what you share with others, whether an entire credential or part of a credential.SSI is fast becoming standardised and interoperable and it is portable, with no vendor lock-in. With everyone having a wallet full of cryptographically verifiable credentials, simply having someone’s personal information will no longer be sufficient to impersonate them.SSI addresses many of the blockchain network participant issues:· blockchain-based backbone (immutable record)· portability of digital identity for individuals, organisations, digital assets, IoT devices, autonomous agents, and non-person entities· individual control of digital identity (personal privacy)· zero-knowledge proofs (security)· eliminate fake digital identities· preserves and enables authentic digital asset ownership through SSI consent and access rights to digital assets· fast, accurate and secure payment of digital royalties, revenue streams, voting rights and payment rightsDecentralised Identifiers (DIDs)Decentralised Identifiers (DIDs) are identifiable endpoints belonging to a Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI) and can be shared publicly. For example: documents, wallets, smart contracts, or programmable agents.A DID makes it possible to own and control IoT devices, non-person entities (NPEs), digital agents such as Autonomous Economic Agents (AEAs), and Decentralised Autonomous Organisations (DAOs), which in turn may own digital assets.Hyperledger Indy & SovrinThe Sovrin Foundation is a member of Hyperledger, a Linux Foundation Project. The Sovrin Foundation uses Hyperledger Indy as the codebase for the Sovrin Network and contributed the initial Indy code for the project.The Sovrin Foundation remains a leading contributor to Hyperledger Indy, Aries, and Ursa projects under the Hyperledger umbrella.Hyperledger Indy provides the tools, libraries, and reusable components for providing digital identities rooted in blockchains or other distributed ledgers so that they are interoperable across administrative domains, applications, and any other silo. The Sovrin network is a deployment of Hyperledger Indy that is compatible with any Hyperledger Aries identity agent.Internet of Things (IoT)In the world of the Internet of Things (IoT), what happens when devices and autonomous agents hold digital assets on our behalf?There needs to be a mechanism and process for accurately and securely identifying digital asset ownership so that valuable digital assets, digital royalties, revenue streams, voting rights, and payment rights may be allocated to the correct owner.Things become more interesting when we introduce the possibility of Autonomous Economic Agents (AEAs) and Decentralised Autonomous Organisations (DAOs).Autonomous Economic Agent (AEA)An AEA is an intelligent agent operating on an owner’s behalf with limited or no interference from the owner. An AEA is self-governing. Its goal is to generate economic value for its owner.AEAs can be considered to be a specific type of agent, with a focus on generating economic and financial value for its owner. It may also hold and own digital assets.Decentralised Autonomous Organisation (DAO)A DAO can be described as a business or organisation whose decisions are automated through computer code or through the vote of its members. It is a system of hard coded rules that define which actions the organisation will take.A DAO is a network that runs autonomously. The network is structured and incentivised to operate without centralised oversight. A DAO could run completely autonomously if the platform is provided with sufficient rules and flexibility.“DAOs do not have a hierarchical structure, except for the code. Once deployed, this entity is independent of its creator. A DAO can be formalized by a smart contract.”The governance and operation of a DAO will most often be operated in accordance with the voting rights of its members (part of the DAOs decentralised decision-making process) which will be closely tied to a Digital Identity.Now it is possible to see how important accurate and secure Digital Identities are becoming and their importance to each of us.ConclusionWith the global adoption of cryptocurrencies, NFTs, and other digital assets accelerating at an ever-increasing pace, it is of primary importance that each of us understands how to secure these valuable assets, their associated payment, and income streams via our Digital Identity. By doing this, we will be able to minimise the potential psychological, emotional, and financial impacts associated with digital asset loss or theft.SSI and DIDs are becoming increasingly important when it comes to protecting our digital assets. In addition, they will have an important role to play when Autonomous Economic Agents (AEAs), and Decentralised Autonomous Organisations (DAOs), and non-person entities (NPEs) become more widely adopted.Fortunately, there already exists products such as Hyperledger Indy, Aries, and Ursa which are supported by organisations such as the Linux Foundation and Sovrin that can enable and ensure safe and secure digital asset ownership via authentic Digital Identities.Nathan van den Bosch is a Behavioural Economist and Blockchain Strategist, with more than 30 years of experience in emerging and disruptive technologies.www.consensusgroup.ioCheck out our new platform 👉 https://thecapital.io/https://twitter.com/thecapital_iohttps://medium.com/media/3b6b127891c5c8711ad105e61d6cc81f/hrefDigital Asset Ownership and Identity on a Public Blockchain was originally published in The Capital on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.
Friedman LLP, a New York-based accounting firm provided auditing services for the stablecoin issuer in 2017The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed and settled charges last week against Friedman LLP, the former auditing firm of stablecoin issuer Tether, finding “serial violations of the federal securities laws” and numerous instances of “improper professional conduct,” according to an order published last Monday.In the SEC’s investigation of Friedman LLP’s audits of two publicly traded companies, Chinese grocery chain iFresh and another, unnamed company, the auditor was found to have lied about conducting its audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.The SEC’s order, issued Friday, details sloppy accounting practices that were common at Friedman LLP from 2015 to 2020, including its failure to “respond to fraud risks” and “exercise due professional care and professional skepticism,” among other things, the order said.Though the SEC’s order against Friedman LLP makes no mention of Tether, the stablecoin issuer retained the New York-based accounting firm from May 2017 to January 2018, when the professional relationship was “dissolved.” At the time, a representative for Tether statedthat the firm was fired for not providing an audit quickly enough.The question of Tether’s reserves is one of the crypto industry’s most persistent mysteries, spurred on by the stablecoin issuer’s own secrecy. Though Tether has taken recent steps toward increased transparency, publishing semiregular attestations verifying its reserves, it has closely guarded other information about its holdings, including their actual composition.Last year, Tether paid $18.5 million to settle a 22-month investigation by the New York attorney general’s office (NYAG) into whether it sought to cover up the loss of $850 million in customer and corporate funds held by a payment processor.Tether’s attorneys have also petitioned the New York Supreme Court to prevent the NYAG from providing the public with documents detailing its reserves, after CoinDesk filed a Freedom of Information Law request seeking access to some of the documents generated by NYAG’s investigation.In its settlement agreement with the SEC, Friedman LLP has agreed to train its staff in proper auditing procedures, and will pay a $1 million civil penalty and $564,138 in disgorgement and prejudgment interest.Did you enjoy what you read? If so, please consider giving us a clap, following us or subscribing to our newsletter. All of these are free for you but will help us keep writing. Thank you!Check out our new platform 👉 https://thecapital.io/https://twitter.com/thecapital_iohttps://medium.com/media/3b6b127891c5c8711ad105e61d6cc81f/hrefTether’s Former Auditor Fined $1M by SEC for Sloppy Accounting was originally published in The Capital on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.
Since the inception of the concept — Decentralization; DAOs have gained incredible adoption in the Web3 space. Reports from Deep Dao prove that there are over 4,000 DAOs with $9.3 billion locked in treasury.Considering the vast popularity of DAOs and their influence on DeFi, it is prior to understand what DAOs are, but more importantly, what brought about the birth of DAOs.Just like every other revolutionary invention, there is always a catalyst behind it. Taking Bitcoin as an example, the 2007–2008 Great Financial Crisis was an event that led to the creation of the deflationary cryptocurrency.The advent of Bitcoin moulded an alternative route to carrying out financial transactions without the involvement of banks or third parties.Likewise, DAOs were not just created from thin air. There was a problem, and only DAOs could fix it. But where did all these start?Let’s dive in!The Origin of DAOsThe concept of DAOs can be traced back to the emergence of DACs — Decentralized Autonomous Corporations, which surfaced during the era of Bitcoin. This was a model adopted by early crypto enthusiasts.In 2013 Daniel Larimer (aka Bytemaster) in his article “Distributed Autonomous Corporations”, explains that a DAC functions as an entity that runs without human involvement. A DAC is controlled by a set of incorruptible business rules, distributed amongst tons of computers.In a DAC, you become a stakeholder by buying “stock”. This stock entitles you to a share of the DAC’s profit and participation in the decision-making process.In his “Let’s Talk Bitcoin”, Daniel Larimer went further to relate this concept to Bitcoin (which according to him was the first DAC). Just like every other traditional corporation, DACs have revenues, costs, shareholders, charters, employees, products, etc.In his analogy, Larimer views Bitcoin as a company with 21 million shares owned by what can be referred to as “Bitcoin’s shareholders”. Bitcoin has a product (or in this case a service) which is a peer-to-peer payment service. It has revenues that it accrues via the fee charged for every transaction. Like any regular company, Bitcoin has employees, the miners who keep the network safe and facilitate transactions. Lastly, Bitcoin has its costs which are the rewards given to miners.On a layman’s level, a DAC is a company that has its business rules across the computers of its stakeholders and gives stakeholders continuous rewards based on the success of the DAC.Bitshares; The first company managed as a DACBitshares is an entity that is somewhat not an easy concept. Daniel Larimer introduced Bitshares on June 2, 2013. Its first version was built off of some of the ideas of Bitcoin. Bitshares can be classified as an industrial-grade crypto-equity, peer-to-peer distributed ledger and network based on a DPoS.BitShares gives its users access to a decentralized exchange and a utility token — BTS. Shareholders can use their BTS tokens to vote in four different elections. Elections for the delegates on the network, committee members, workers, and whether a proposal should receive funding or not from the BTS budget.The “DAC” feature gives traditional business the platform to launch DACs which operates without human involvement. These DACs are governed by the protocols programmed into the network. Various DACs could trade their shares on BitShares DEX which entitles buyers to dividends and governance.While the concept of DACs seemed to be a possible breakthrough in forging a decentralized economy, it wasn’t sufficient enough. For one, DACs were linked to a corporate governance model, which was seen as too restrictive.In detail, most DACs had to deal with the following problems:Automation VS Human ContributionA corporation can be defined as a group of people working together as a single entity under a set of specific rules. A corporation could be built up for various purposes, with its stakeholders contributing individual resources to grow the entity. In the case of DACs, the question of “if the human effort is needed” arouse different speculations concerning the framework in which DACs were built.For most, the “shareholders” were simply persons who provided liquidity to the DAC via purchasing of shares. When it comes to active contributions from members, not every DAC could have this.Profit Orientated VS Community OrientatedSince DACs were built in the model of a company on the blockchain, it is fair to say that DACs were built solely to make profit. The blueprints of DACs simply reveal a system where people buy shares and get dividends as long as the DAC exists. But what about the community?The involvement of a community goes beyond participating in governance which can be manipulated based on shares holdings. Also, the fact that DACs get its initial capital from shareholders proves that small contributors would not be given much prestige, considering they offer little value to the corporation.Complexity VS SimplicityThe ideology of DACs was still one that was incomprehensible by most early adopters. For some, a DAC was simply an investment, where you buy shares and earn continual receipts. For others, the concept of DACs was seen as a means of IPOing their company to get cash flow.Additionally, others saw the need for DACs to adopt a legal framework which would secure shareholder’s holdings.The Solution; DAOThe complex framework of DACs lead to the concept being obsolete. At the most, it wasn’t a complete whole, DAO was.The concept of DAO emerged in an article by Vitalik Buterin on May 6, 2014. In his report, the Ethereum co-founder resolved the misconception of DACs, stating that DACs are smaller topics and a subclass of DAOs.He further explained that Bitcoin is more of a DAO than a DAC, pointing out that a bitcoin is not a share as it does not entitle its holders to any form of dividend or governance power.Conclusively, all DACs are DAOs but not all DAOs are DACs.What is A DAOA DAO is an entity that lives on the internet and exists autonomously but heavily relies on humans to perform certain tasks that automation cannot do. In this context, DAOs are community orientated.The first DAO — “The DAO” was ideated in July 2015 by a team called Slock.it. Launched on Ethereum in May 2016, The DAO was a crowdfunding smart contract that amassed a total of 12 million Ether. These were the early days of Ethereum and solidity was still a clumsy concept for most. Due to this issue, most smart contracts then were easily penetrable by third parties.The DAO smart contract suffered an attack that led to the drainage of the contract’s funds. This type of attack is known as a “reentrancy exploit”.Today, blockchain technology is a feasible concept and Ethereum is a much more reliable network.What is the Future of DAOsAs the concept of Web3 continues to mature, birthing a DAO has become a popular option as it offers the opportunity to build and grow organizations in a decentralized way. Today, we see various kinds of DAOs emerging that serve different purposes. Some of these are Protocol DAOs, Grant DAOs, Social DAOs and SubDAOs amongst others.These records only prove that there is no shortage of DAO use cases. So, it’s not a question of “if” but when would the concept of DAOs colonize the framework of traditional companies?Check out our new platform 👉 https://thecapital.io/https://twitter.com/thecapital_iohttps://medium.com/media/3b6b127891c5c8711ad105e61d6cc81f/hrefWhere in the world did DAOs come from? was originally published in The Capital on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.
DAILY CONQUEST #098The days crypto news, insights and alpha.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashThe crypto market is a wild, wondrous and intimidating place; don’t trek alone! Subscribe to The Crypto Conquistador, and let us be your guide.Subscribe to this daily newsletter TO NEVER MISS AN ISSUE.OverviewThe future of Bitcoin: Taro Protocol.Markets pause rally.GMX listed on Binance — price soars.One step closer to MiCA regulations in Europe.The Do Kwon saga continues.Good morning Fam,Have you heard about the latest development in Bitcoin?We’ve mentioned it in the newsletter before, but today we’ll dive a little deeper and show you why Taro might be one of the most important protocols to have emerged from the Bitcoin ecosystem.Source: TwitterTaro (Taproot Asset Representation Overlay) is a protocol that allows digital assets to be issued on the Bitcoin blockchain. Taro means tokens, stablecoins, and even NFTs will soon be available on the network.Doctor Profit 🇨🇭 on Twitter: "Spoke in April about #Bitcoin Taro update, its happening now, and its bigger than most of people can imagine.Stablecoins, NFTs, Oil Contracts and Stock Market can be bounded to Taproots TARO #Bitcoin Blockchain.Only few understood, and few will understand. pic.twitter.com/hyD3oPuIMK / Twitter"Spoke in April about #Bitcoin Taro update, its happening now, and its bigger than most of people can imagine.Stablecoins, NFTs, Oil Contracts and Stock Market can be bounded to Taproots TARO #Bitcoin Blockchain.Only few understood, and few will understand. pic.twitter.com/hyD3oPuIMKBut Bitcoin is old news. According to Arcane Research, the Lightning Network continues to see sustained growth. So what do you think will happen when stablecoins and NFTs are introduced to the Lightning Network?Source: Arcane ResearchUtilizing the Lightning Network, assets created on Taro can be transferred instantly and at a low cost, opening up a world of opportunities for Bitcoin to continue its growing network effects.Click here to read more about Taro.Market update 🌍BTC/USDT 1DAfter two days of rallying, BTC fell to a low of $19,730 before closing the daily candle down -0.88% to $20,158. BTC shows strength ahead of the US jobs report on Friday morning. High numbers would represent continuing strength in the US labor market and incentivize the US Federal Reserve to continue aggressive rate hikes.High-resolution chartGMX/USDT 1DWithin 24 hours after listing on its first major exchange (Binance), the GMX token rose from $41 to a high of $64.95. Traders took advantage of bullish development before returning the price to $50. GMX remains above its up-trend support (red) after testing the level on October the 2nd. There are plenty of reasons (covered in yesterday’s newsletter) to remain bullish on GMX, but expect high volatility as more centralized exchanges begin listing the token. GMX completed the daily candle up +21.74% to $50.56.High-resolution chartNewswatch 📰SWIFT proves it can handle CBDCs. In not-so-exciting news, the global cross-bank transaction system has presented a framework to transact with central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) in an interoperable system. SWIFT ran experiments with various central and private banks while carrying out transactions between blockchains and fiat currencies.EU legislators agree to the Markets in Crypto Regulation (MiCA). EU legislators agreed to the text in the landmark MiCA regulation bill. The bill aims to regulate crypto’s various aspects and eliminate privacy concerns with crypto wallets. Additionally, the bill includes a framework for stablecoins to avoid future incidents such as Terra’s UST collapse.Patrick Hansen on Twitter: "Update on MiCA: The text was approved today in the Council of the EU and is now public!Next steps: -ECON vote in the EP on Oct 10-lawyer/linguist checks-plenary vote in the EP-publication in the official journal of the EUMiCA text: https://t.co/7Er0dDJwxX / Twitter"Update on MiCA: The text was approved today in the Council of the EU and is now public!Next steps: -ECON vote in the EP on Oct 10-lawyer/linguist checks-plenary vote in the EP-publication in the official journal of the EUMiCA text: https://t.co/7Er0dDJwxXCelsius Executives cashed out a total of $56M in crypto before bankruptcy.Crypto exchange OKX’s website was blocked in Russia for unknown reasons.Paxos will provide custodial services for crypto exchange EDX Markets.Coinbase to release a documentary this Friday.Do Kwon denies reports that South Korean prosecutors froze his funds.NFT & metaverse update 🐵Cool Cats announces strategic partnership with Animoca Brands!Trademarks for Web3 and NFTs in 2022 have surpassed the 2021 total.Mike Kondoudis on Twitter: "So far this year, 4317 US trademark apps have been filed for digital or cryptocurrencies and related goods/services:Jan: 481Feb: 539 March: 609 April: 584 May: 549June: 450July: 403Aug: 335Sept: 367The 2021 total was 3547#Crypto #Fintech #DeFi #Cryptocurrencies #Web3 pic.twitter.com/VevxKf31hZ / Twitter"So far this year, 4317 US trademark apps have been filed for digital or cryptocurrencies and related goods/services:Jan: 481Feb: 539 March: 609 April: 584 May: 549June: 450July: 403Aug: 335Sept: 367The 2021 total was 3547#Crypto #Fintech #DeFi #Cryptocurrencies #Web3 pic.twitter.com/VevxKf31hZThe creators of Blankos Block Party, Mythical Games, step deeper into Web3 with the creation of Mythos Foundation.My five cents…What was the best-performing asset of Q3? Was it gold? Apple stocks? Maybe Nasdaq?Nope. It was ETH!In a chart released by Coin Metrics, ETH outperformed all major assets (excluding commodities).Source: Coin MetricsEven though the Merge was a “sell the news” event, Ether (ETH) still held the top spot in Q3. Moreover, with global macro conditions worsening, crypto is making its mark by maintaining its levels while many assets continue to struggle.Things are looking up for Q4!GabrielFollow me on Twitter for daily updates!Check out our new platform 👉 https://thecapital.io/https://twitter.com/thecapital_iohttps://medium.com/media/3b6b127891c5c8711ad105e61d6cc81f/hrefThe Latest Bitcoin Upgrade is a Game-changer. was originally published in The Capital on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.
A reminder: if it looks anything like a scam, then it is a scam. Run away!Continue reading on The Capital »
Disclaimer: As a news and information platform, also aggregate headlines from other sites, and republish small text snippets and images. We always link to original content on other sites, and thus follow a 'Fair Use' policy. For further content, we take great care to only publish original material, but since part of the content is user generated, we cannot guarantee this 100%. If you believe we violate this policy in any particular case, please contact us and we'll take appropriate action immediately.

Our main goal is to make crypto grow by making news and information more accessible for the masses.